Adaptive Ecology, Growth Strategies and the Global Bloom Expansion of Dinoflagellates

Adaptive Ecology, Growth Strategies and the Global Bloom Expansion of Dinoflagellates

Theodore J. Smayda

Journal of Oceanography, Vol. 58, pp. 281 to 294, 2002

DOI: 10.1023/A:1015861725470

First, I must say that Dr. Smayda (d.2017) was apparently “The Man” when it came to study of harmful algae blooms.  I wish I had bumped into him sooner.

Read anything you can find by him.  Read anything that cites his work.

This work is a review article….click through and read the whole thing!!

Dinoflagellates behave as annual species, bloom soloists, are ecophysiologically diverse and habitat specialists, whereas diatoms behave as peren- nial species, guild members and are habitat cosmopolites. Diatoms have a relatively uniform bloom strategy based on species-rich pools and exhibit limited habitat spe- cialization. Dinoflagellates have multiple life-form strategies consistent with their diverse habitat specializations, but rely on impoverished bloom species pools.

Diatoms and flagellates, for example, generally have similar nutrient requirements (excluding the need for silica), but diatoms, when nutrient-limited, seek to alleviate limitation through a sink-strategy, while flagellates use a swim-strategy (Smayda, 1997a).

Diatom blooms (independent of species composition) have five major features: coastal (including upwelling systems) diatom blooms are annually recurrent, predictable, prolonged, of high species diversity, and a species succession occurs (Guillard and Kilham, 1977; Smayda, 1980). Dinoflagellate blooms, in contrast, usually are unpredictable, ephemeral, of low species diversity, and exhibit a rudimentary species succession, if any.

That’s only the tip of the iceberg….click and read!!!

The toxic benthic dinoflagellates of the genus Ostreopsis in temperate areas: a review

The toxic benthic dinoflagellates of the genus Ostreopsis in temperate areas: a review

Stefano Accoroni, Cecilia Totti

Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, 2016; 7(1): 1-15

DOI: 10.4081/aiol.2016.5591

Key Points:

  • Correct ID of Ostreopsis species in the field (distinguishing between them) is “highly problematic” requiring a comparison of precise anatomical measurements and experience comparing strains from different regions.  Even genetic ID has been complicated.  They are now referring to some Ostreopsis as species-complexes and clades.
  • Either P- or N-depletion has been shown to lower Ostreopsis ovata toxicity.  (Strain, growth phase and salinity all figure it too.)
  • Turbulence affects growth rate/cell-size.
  • Cell counts were consistently lower in exposed sites vs sheltered ones.
  • Dino’s are easy to dislodge, which is why they show a preference for calm areas
  • Turbulence is most effective against them at the peak population levels when they are mat-forming.
  • While it appears there is a general preference for higher temperatures during the peak bloom (77ºF+) they tend to range widely and some strains appear to have multiple optimal ranges.
  • N:P around the Redfield ratio and temperatures of at least 77ºF seems necessary to allow cell proliferation.
  • Temperatures to stop a bloom were much lower, however – around or under 60ºF.
  • Blooms appear to be initiated under low-N/low-P conditions and then spike with a flush of nutrients.
  • It’s also suggested that Ostreopsis toxins might be intended for survival under low-N/low-P conditions while waiting for conditions to become ideal.  (Which seems to be an elevation in temperature along with a spike in nutrients.)
  • At least one strain of Ostreopsis showed a very strong demand for P in depletion tests, which was remarkable among dinoflagellates.
  • It’s suggested that Ostreopsis may share the habit known of other dinoflagellates for resorting bacterivory/mixotrophy under low-P/low-nutrient conditions.
  • Most Ostreopsis species exhibited lowered growth rates at light intensities around 250 PAR and higher….sometimes only slightly lowered, sometimes significantly.
  • Higher light levels may also be related to mucus formation (for photodamage protection) and settling from their planktonic stage.
  • However, being motile, they are also capable of migrating from brighter to shadier areas.
  • Although recorded in the wild on a variety of substrates, there are many reports that they prefer to be epiphytic on macroalgae, which as an environment is known to have low light availability.
  • Interestingly, living substrates like macroalgae support the lowest cell densities of all sampled substrates.
  • All investigated seaweed types exhibited a negative effect on Ostreopsis counts: brown, red and green algae.  The brown algae Dictyota dichotoma had the strongest effect….a red algae the weakest.

A review on the effects of environmental conditions on growth and toxin production of Ostreopsis ovata

A review on the effects of environmental conditions on growth and toxin production of Ostreopsis ovata

R. Pistocchi, L. Pezzolesi, F. Guerrini, S. Vanucci, C. Dell’Aversano, E. Fattorusso

doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2010.09.013

For the same strain, both nitrogen and phosphorus limitation determined a decrease in cell toxicity showing different behaviour with respect to many other toxic dinoflagellates.

There’s more to mine from this PDF, but I’m out of reading time.

Physiological responses of Ostreopsis ovata to changes in N and P availability and temperature increase

Physiological responses of Ostreopsis ovata to changes in N and P availability and temperature increase

Nayani K. Vidyarathna, Edna Granéli.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hal.2012.11.006

Results indicated that under nutrient sufficiency O. ovata biomass accumulation increased significantly compared to N and P deficiency and also that N limitation severely affected growth.

The highest growth rates were recorded at 30 °C.

Cellular contents and the atomic ratios of C, N and P were higher in the cells grown at 20 °C than in those grown at 30 °C.

O. ovata cell volumes increased at 20 °C.

N deficiency significantly increased cell toxicity.

Toxicity per cell was higher at 20 °C, but per carbon was highest at 30 °C.

The highest carbohydrate production was found in conditions of N deficiency and at the lower temperature.

I wish I could find a whole copy for reading, but at least the abstract gives all the results!

Phosphatase activities of a microepiphytic community during a bloom of Ostreopsis cf. ovata in the northern Adriatic Sea

Phosphatase activities of a microepiphytic community during a bloom of Ostreopsis cf. ovata in the northern Adriatic Sea

Stefano Accoronia, Cecilia Tottia, Emanuela Razzaa,
Roberta Congestrib, Alessandra Campanellic, Mauro Marinic, Neil Thomas William Ellwoodd

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.004

“Ostreopsis seems to have an adaptation that lets it thrive in P-poor environments where organic phosphate is the main source of P.”

This is contrary to most dino’s we see.

Inhibitory effect of polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs) on the growth of the toxic benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata

Inhibitory effect of polyunsaturated aldehydes (PUAs) on the growth of the toxic benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis cf. ovata

August 2016 · Aquatic toxicology (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 08/2016; 179:126-133.

DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2016.08.018

Salvatore Pichierri, Laura Pezzolesi, Silvana Vanucci, Cecilia Totti, Rossella Pistocchi

 

Book: Biology of Stress In Fish – Fish Physiology (Chapter 12 – Stress Management And Welfare)

Book: Biology of Stress In Fish – Fish Physiology (Chapter 12 – Stress Management And Welfare)

Lynne U Sneddon, David C.C. Wolfenden, Jack S Thomson
Biology of Stress in Fish – Fish Physiology, pp.463-539

The Chapter 12 authors have posted their work on Research Gate here:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309613409_Stress_Management_and_Welfare

DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802728-8.00012-6 (Science Direct)

There is not only a lack of familiarity with what constitutes stress and what side-effects stress can have, but there’s even a pretty fair amount of denial of it’s role in health and sickness.  All of that is laid fairly to rest in this book.

For example from this chapter, we can learn:

  • Short term (acute) stress – like being caught in a net – isn’t so bad for a fish.  It’s just a coping mechanism and long term consequences would not be expected.
  • Long term (chronic) stress – like three months in QT with a pack of strange fish – will have a more lasting negative impact on growth, immunity and reproduction.

In spite of how much of the book is online, they don’t allow quoting from any of it from any source I’ve found, so you can read the rest for yourself!

https://books.google.com/books?id=KcEOCAAAQBAJ&lpg=PP1&dq=biology%20of%20stress%20in%20fish&pg=PP1&output=embed